This webinar will present key findings from ALNAP’s new study ‘What’s Missing? Adding Context to the Urban Response Toolbox’ and feature presentations from two organizations currently using context-specific analysis tools.
This webinar explored the social norms marketing approach used by the Voices for Change initiative to inspire young people’s attitudinal and behavior change towards women’s role in household decision-making, women’s leadership, and violence against women and girls in Nigeria. The Voices for Change team shared insights around the design of the approach and the monitoring and evaluation system developed to track the audience response to the mass-media communications, changes in attitudes and behaviors throughout the period of implementation, and how the change happened.
IRC Italy’s team won Second Runner-Up in InterAction’s 2020 Results-Based Protection Good Practice Contest for their two-way information Platform Refugee.Info. The two-way information platform consciously grew beyond its original focus as a communication platform to facilitate protection trends analysis as it saw rising cases of evictions happening among refugee and asylum-seeking populations.
As a submission to the 2020 Results-Based Protection (RBP) Good Practice Contest, the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) team in Iraq presented a tool designed to facilitate a community-based and participatory approach to the identification, prioritization, and analysis of protection risks. The tool, awarded “Runner-Up” in the RBP contest, provides an excellent framework for light-touch, context-specific protection analysis according to the risk equation, a key element of Results-Based Protection.
As a submission to the 2020 Results-Based Protection (RBP) Good Practice Contest, Elena Bartoloni from the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) team in Iraq presented a tool that is designed to facilitate a community-based and participatory approach to the identification, prioritization, and analysis of protection risks. The tool, awarded “Runner-Up” in the RBP contest, provides an excellent framework for light-touch context-specific protection analysis according to the risk equation, a key element of Results-Based Protection (RBP).
MindShift: A Collection of Examples that Promote Protection Outcomes, spotlights 13 case examples from different humanitarian organizations working across the world on protection
In 2020, ACAPS contributed to InterAction’s Results-Based Protection Practitioners’ Roundtable, Getting Practical with Prevention: What does it take to reduce risk? by helping to develop a simple framework for protection analysis building on core guidance from Results-Based Protection.
UNFPA Regional Syria Hub and the Whole of Syria GBV AoR teams was awarded Honorable Mention in InterAction’s 2020 Results-Based Protection Good Practice Contest for their approach to GBV data collection in Syria.
Risk mapping can be particularly helpful to explore context-specific risks with affected community members to deepen humanitarian actors’ protection analysis and jointly design effective programs that achieve protection outcomes. Risk mapping can allow space for those affected by the risks to share a more nuanced description of the threat, vulnerabilities, and capacities per risk type. This insight provides a solid basis for strong protection analysis and helps to prioritize key risks affecting a community.
Focusing on the risk equation, JHAJA tackled what many humanitarian organizations find challenging—addressing the threat—in their work to reduce violence in Honduras. Their willingness to work with gang-affiliated members has allowed them to intervene in ways other organizations cannot.