Photo of RBP Tip Sheet: Iterative Evaluation for Protection (Part 3)

Resources

InterAction has published and collected resources including tools, reports, project evaluations, blogposts, and others from Members and partners that promote results-based approaches to protection since 2012; all of which can be found in this resource library. To explore practical case examples of RBP in practice, visit the case example page. Background photo By: Simon Moricz Sabjan is licensed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.

Featured Resource

Protection for People: What Do We Mean? Guidance for Senior Leadership

Search By Keyword

Sort

Search

Filters

Type

Category

Country

Year Published
Filter Results
221 Total Results

  • RBP Tip Sheet: Iterative Evaluation for Protection (Part 3)

    In this series of tip sheets, InterAction highlights helpful considerations, resources, and examples of good practice to cultivate an evaluative mindset and using evaluation to adapt interventions for protective impact. The previous installments in this series of tips focused on establishing “evaluability” for protection interventions, defining the purpose and determining the criteria for success, and selecting evaluation approaches and methods. Iterative evaluation practice requires an enabling environment that supports feedback loops, whereby analysis and recommendations feed into decision-making and programmatic and strategic adaptation. This final tip sheet highlights a few considerations for the resources, processes, and organizational culture which support iterative evaluation for protection.

    Published: 2018

  • RBP Tip Sheet: Iterative Evaluation Practice for Protection (Tip Sheet 2)

    In this series of tip sheets, InterAction highlights helpful considerations, resources, and examples of good practice to cultivate an evaluative mindset and using evaluation to adapt interventions for protective impact. The first installment of this series of tips focused on establishing “evaluability” for protection interventions, defining the purpose and determining the criteria for success. This tip sheet outlines the next stages in the process – from refining our evaluation questions to considering which methods and approaches can help us learn and adapt in an iterative way.

    Published: 2018

  • Results-Based Protection Tip Sheet: Iterative Evaluation Practice for Protection

    In this series of tip sheets, InterAction will highlight helpful considerations, resources, and examples of good practice as it relates to cultivating an evaluative mindset and using evaluation to adapt interventions for protective impact. The first installment of this series of tips focuses on establishing “evaluability” for protection interventions, defining the purpose and determining the criteria for success.

    Published: 2018

  • Report of the Secretary-General’s Internal Review Panel on UN Action in Sri Lanka

    The 2012 Independent Review Panel Report on UN’s Sri Lanka Response highlighted inadequate contextual analysis, little investment in local capacities, and lack of strategic orientation towards protection outcomes

    Published: 2014

  • Tool: Matrix of resources on Communicating with Communities and Accountability to Affected Populations

    In 2011, the IASC Principals agreed to five Commitments on Accountability to Affected Populations (CAAP) as part of a framework for engagement with communities. The revised version was developed and endorsed by the IASC Principals in November 2017 to reflect essential developments such as the Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS), the work done by the IASC on inter-agency community-based complaints mechanisms including PSEA, and the importance of meaningful collaboration with local stakeholders, which came out as a priority recommendation from the 2016 World Humanitarian Summit and in the Grand Bargain.

    Published: 2018

  • Series: Ethics and M&E in the Digital Age

    These discussions dug deeply into how peace and development programs consider the pressing issues of safety, security, privacy, flexibility, and accessibility in an increasingly tech-enabled world.

    Published: 2016

  • Situation Monitoring & Adaptation

    The Results-Based Protection Program continues to explore key components in current practice to better adjust and refine the approach and guidance needed to support both program and situation monitoring of a response.

    Published: 2014

  • Historical + Cultural + Contextual Analysis*

    What does it mean to do a historical, Cultural, and Contextual analysis to understand the threat, vulnerability, and capacity? InterAction aims to respond to this question noting why it is necessary and how it can be done.

    Published: 2014

  • ToR: Lebanon In-Country Consultations 2015

    In March 2015, the Results-Based Protection Program visited Lebanon to look at program design and how key characteristics of the design phase of a protection response contribute to protection outcomes.

    Published: 2015

  • ToR: InterAction Missions to Myanmar

    In early 2017, InterAction completed two complementary missions in support of humanitarian NGOs’ protection strategies in Myanmar. The first focused on NGO roles in relation to the overall protection leadership, coordination, and strategies, while the second focused on critical methods and approaches NGOs can use to achieve protection outcomes.

    Published: 2017

STAY UPDATED ON DEVELOPMENT IN RESULTS-BASED PROTECTION

Sign up to receive our monthly digest of new information, analysis, and tools from throughout the humanitarian community.

Sign-up

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Photo By: Toms George is licensed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license.
Share
Return